Automated Vs. Manual Testing

Manual testing and automated testing are two primary methods for testing software. Both solutions are critical when it comes to the development of software. With manual testing, the individual carrying out the testing needs to site in front of numerous screens and go through all of the code. Automated testing is the opposite of this, with software and tools being used to automatically test cases. Both options have their advantages and disadvantages, and both will need to be used depending on the situation. There are lots of factors to take into account, for example, the number of testers, timeline, and budget.

 

What are the pros and cons of automated testing?

There are many benefits that are associated with automated testing. This includes the fact that fewer testers are needed to execute test cases, regression testing is much easier because of the tools, and results are usually more reliable and accurate because of the automation. You can also easily customize with agile testing numbers and other metrics. In addition to this, while it may be costly, to begin with, it is the most affordable option over time. It is also much faster than the alternative. The drawbacks include necessitating programming and less UI feedback.

 

What are the pros and cons of manual testing?

Some of the advantages of this option for businesses include the following: programming is not required, there is a lower financial impact in the short-term, and the user-friendliness is better because of the tester oversight of the application. However, there are some significant disadvantages too. This includes the fact that it is laborious and time-consuming, less reliable, results are of a low accuracy, and everything being done manually means it is extremely time intensive.

 

When should you use automated testing?

There are a number of different scenarios that are best suited to automated testing. This includes performance testing, repeated execution, and load testing. Automated testing is also beneficial for regression testing because of the ability to run regressions in a time efficient way and the frequent code changes. It is also the best choice for load and performance testing and data-driven testing too.

 

When should you use manual testing

Manual testing is beneficial for ad-hoc testing. It can also be the better choice for usability testing, which is when you need to determine how convenient, efficient, or user-friendly a product or software is for the end user. Human observation is a critical element here, which is why the manual approach comes recommended. Finally, manual testing also works well for exploratory testing too.

 

Hopefully, you now have a better understanding regarding the pros and cons associated with manual and automated testing. As you can see, both have their uses, and you need to carefully consider which option you are going to go for when you are testing software at your business.

 

 

Featured:https://images.pexels.com/photos/577585/pexels-photo-577585.jpeg?auto=compress&cs=tinysrgb&h=350

Elita Torres

I have over 20 years experience as a leader, first as a General Manager for several Big Box retailers with over 100 employees, then as a district manager overseeing an average of 23 stores. Currently, I am a Sales Director overseeing 4 Districts. My passion for leadership and personal development has led me to share my journey in a Blog. Find out more on http://www.leadgrowdevelop.com/about/